![]() Juror 54, the presiding juror in the case, signed the “not guilty” verdict sheets for counts 1 and 2 today. The other three "not guilty" verdict sheets were dated Wednesday and Thursday. They show that the presiding juror in the case signed only two of the five "not guilty" verdicts today. The sheets were filed with the Kenosha County Clerk of the Circuit Court. Jury verdict sheets from the trial appear to give some insight into the jury's process of deliberation. The defense argued the prosecution purposely sought to have the case thrown out because it was "going badly" for them.Kyle Rittenhouse, the teenager who killed two people and shot another during unrest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was acquitted Friday of first-degree intentional homicide and four other felony charges. The defense called for a mistrial with prejudice, which if granted would mean that Rittenhouse couldn't be tried again, over Binger's actions. In the first week of proceedings, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger was reprimanded by the judge for asking Rittenhouse about a video that had already been ruled as inadmissible evidence.īinger was also condemned for asking Rittenhouse why he is now only just speaking publicly about the case, despite defendants having the legal right to remain silent until their trial in order not to incriminate themselves. This is the second time during proceedings that the defense has called for a mistrial. The prosecution said the drone footage is also a piece of key evidence as it shows Rittenhouse lied during his testimony when he said he didn't point his rifle at the Black Lives Matter protesters that night. "I do not believe an unknown technical incident should result in a mistrial," he said. Prosecutor James Kraus argued that the defense only received a compressed version of the footage because it had been sent to them via email. The prosecution argued that the footage also shows that Rosenbaum didn't lunge toward Rittenhouse's rifle before the then 17-year-old fired at him four times. The video shown to the jury by the prosecution appears to show Rittenhouse pointing his gun at protesters before being chased by Joseph Rosenbaum. The prosecution were hoping the drone footage proved Rittenhouse was an instigator of the violence in Kenosha last August. "That's a losing argument for sure." What the Drone Footage Showed "You can't just say, 'The state gave me a lower-quality video and therefore I get a mistrial,'" Meyn said. However, he said that this is unlikely as there must be proof that the prosecution's actions influenced the jury. Speaking to the Associated Press, Ion Meyn, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School, said the judge could grant a mistrial even if he finds the prosecution merely made an honest mistake. If granted, the guilty verdict will be void and Rittenhouse could face a new trial. ![]() Schroeder added that he will address the mistrial request if Rittenhouse is found guilty of the homicide charges against him. "If they got everything correct and it's reliable, then they won't have a problem. "There's a day of reckoning with respect to these things," he said. He did allow the jury to re-watch the drone footage, but warned the prosecution if the video proves to be unreliable that "it's going to be ugly" for them. Judge Bruce Schroeder didn't immediately rule on the new mistrial request. Rittenhouse Judge Says He Allowed Defendant to Pick Jurors for 'Optics'. ![]() Matt Gaetz Wants To Hire Kyle Rittenhouse as a Congressional Intern.Kyle Rittenhouse Prosecution 'Scored Major Points' in Closing Arguments."The failure to provide the same quality footage in this particular case is intentional and clearly prejudices the defendant." "The idea that the state would provide lesser quality footage and then use that footage as a linchpin in their case and it is the very reason they requested and were granted the provocation instruction by the court," Rittenhouse's defense team wrote, while filing for a mistrial. Lawyers for the 18-year-old defendant have argued that the case should be dismissed because the prosecution presented them with inferior quality drone footage before showing the jury a high-resolution version during closing arguments.ĭefense attorney Corey Chirafisi called for a mistrial without prejudice, meaning Rittenhouse could be retried, after alleging the prosecution deliberately withheld the higher-quality footage. The second day of deliberations in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial was halted as jurors asked to re-watch several videos presented as evidence, including drone footage that's at the center of the defense's call for a mistrial.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |